Two new trees have been made with CYP4 sequences as the main content. These
trees
illustrate the difficulty of maintaining a sensible nomenclature when families
get very large.
There are some inconsistencies. The 4D subfamily has been split over time into
two
different clusters of sequences. Cyp4p should probably be in a separate family.
The 4F
subfamily has also been split. I have started using double letters as in
Cyp4aa1 for new
subfamilies because the single letters have all been used. Please go the the
Drosophila
section to see these new trees.
Related
